ecostory 92-2007
A "carbon neutral" bottled water company and a
"Call for cap on bottled water use"

home | climate | energy | sustainability | water | back
Quotes only - from the below >article< - minimal comment.
  • "Over the past decade, global consumption of bottled water has soared to 180bn litres a year, from 78bn litres a decade ago, [...]
  • "[...] global sales of bottled water rose more than 10 per cent in the first half of the year"
  • "Anheuser Busch in the US, recently became the first bottled water company to be certified as "carbon neutral"."
Environmental developments:
  • The day of "Peak oil", i.e. the highest daily amount of oil extracted, is approaching. It is expected within one to twenty years. Thereafter petroleum will be used for prioritary applications. (compare fossil energy developments)

    Our comment:
  • The argument of water quality for the poor is not valid. The money used on bottled water would be far more efficiently (financial and ecological) used for public water systems that serve all.
  • The environmental impact of bottled water is not just the oil use. It's also the whole infrastructure needed for production of the bottles (machinery, factories), for transportatiuon (roads, trucks), and the manpower that could be used to produce other goods.
  • "Carbon neutral" is complete nonsense. There is no way to produce anything in our present sociey without consuming huge amounts of fossil fuels in the process and thereby emitting greenhouse gases.
    If "carbon neutral" is claimed to be achieved by offsetting emissions by contributing to so-called "clean development" projects, this is mostly a delusion. Those projects do not decrease emissions. At best they reduce emissions in comparison to a business as usual scenario. Moreover, those projects increase industrial activity and economic growth, which in their own right increase greenhous gas emissions and resource depletion.

    Your comment or question
  • home | a-z site map | write to writing for change... halt  | ecostory | feedback
    zurück - retour - backecoglobe since1997

    Call for cap on bottled water use

    By Jenny Wiggins in London, Financial Times 17 Sept. 2007, page 6. (Copyright notice) NEWS ANALYSIS Questions are being raised about the environmental cost of drinking fromdisposable palstic containers, writes Jenny Wiggins

    It was not so long ago that asking a waiter for bottled water in a US or British ­restaurant was considered pretentious.

    Today bottled water is so prevalent – in offices, coffee shops, supermarkets and homes – that a request for tap water is likely to cause more embarrassment.

    Over the past decade, global consumption of bottled water has soared to 180bn litres a year, from 78bn litres a decade ago, according to Zenith International, consultants to the food and drinks industry. However, questions are now being asked about the environmental costs of packaging this volume of water in disposable plastic containers.

    In the US, the world’s biggest market for bottled water, city governments have started banning bottled water dispensers from their offices, with some switching to filtered water systems. About 40 per cent of bottled water sold in the US, including Aquafina and Dasani, is purified tap water.

    They say that the plastic used to package water is a waste of oil, while low recycling rates mean plastic bottles end up in landfill, leaching chemicals into the soil over the hundreds of years they take to degrade. Officials also claim oil is wasted transporting bottled water and that marketing by the industry leads low-income consumers to believe that bottled water is better than tap water.

    The Container Recycling Institute, a non-profit organisation, estimates that less than 20 per cent of non-carbonated drink bottles were recycled in 2005, and that some 2m tons of PET bottles, which are made from petroleum, were thrown away instead of being recycled.

    Meanwhile, pressure groups have been urging consumers to stop drinking bottled water.

    Food and Water Watch is running an online pledge, encouraging people to "take back the tap" and sign a petition calling on Congress to create a trust fund for public water. Corporate Accountability International is asking people to "think outside the bottle".

    Companies that make ­filtered water systems and reusable steel or plastic have been taking advantage of the backlash, with filter group Brita teaming up with bottle manufacturer Nalgene to create a website called "Filter for Good" where visitors are asked to switch to reusable water bottles.

    The campaigns have un-settled the bottling industry. But the International Bottled Water Association says discouraging people from drinking bottled water may lead them to drink less-healthy beverages and companies are feeling unfairly targeted. Joseph Doss, president and chief executive of the body, says: "Any action that would discourage consumers from drinking a healthy beverage like bottled water is not in the public interest."

    Nevertheless, the association is planning to undertake a trial recycling programme in four US cities.

    Some analysts are sceptical that bottled water sales will be hurt by the recent backlash. And it does not yet appear to be hurting corporate profits.

    Nestlé, the world’s biggest bottled water company and the owner of the Perrier and Vittel brands, said that global sales of bottled water rose more than 10 per cent in the first half of the year.

    Still, bottled water companies have begun taking steps to prove they care about the environment. Icelandic Glacial, which recently signed a distribution agreement with brewing group Anheuser Busch in the US, recently became the first bottled water company to be certified as "carbon neutral", while Coca-Cola is building a plastic recycling plant.

    Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007
    We reproduced this article for reference reasons only.